Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 18-07-2009, 11:25 AM   #9
Swordsman88
Getting it done.....
 
Swordsman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fte50
Harsh - Good point. You ever tried revving a Holden V6?
Believe as you like, but when your local management are simply not management material, what hope is there for quality. Secondly, they have tried too run so many variants (export etc) on the 1 ***. line, they have continually mixed components etc, not forgetting that for many of the proccess workers (no disrespect to them) they dont know the difference from an intake valve to a ball valve. There simply isnt any ownership.
As for the machines tolerances, lets just say that they WERE/ARE the cheapest machine tooling option available at the time for that particular purpose and tolerances are now somewhat of a dismal memory. Im sure you would also love to know that the machines had error proofing stations to reduce scrap rates and improve quality etc, but guess what - m.e. (manufacturing engineering) removed them.
Finally, if you dont get what i mean about bore/stroke ratio, do some learning and grow a moustache first before you pass judgement and decide somethings baloney. Simple as that.
Interesting you mention this point. Recently Holden announced an export deal for the HFV6 to south america where they build a chevy small suv (can't remember name). I checked out the specs on that car on a US site and it is basically the 190kw HFV6 we have now (or is that 195??). At the same time holden has people spinning the fact that a DI 3.0 and DI 3.6 V6 will be coming down the line very soon, and to my knowledge they still do the 3.2 and 2.8 (with turbo) for SAAB. Open also uses the 2.8 T V6 on the new insignia VXR. How many different types can you get down one line before confusion results. If that chinese deal goes through (plus the south american deal) that means you are building 2.8T, 3.0DI, 3.2 (Di??), 3.6, 3.6DI all one one line. Surely some rationalisation woudl be good....too bad HOlden is GMs beatch and have to build whatever each division wants.

Much was made when Ford decided to build just one atmo I6, and the XR6 lost its bespoke engine. Ford excuse was to quote the I6T as the new six performance king but i was a bit miffed myself tobe honest. BUT at least ford got the benefit of simplifying the production line even more. When territory goes over to the FG engines that will make it even easier. No such luck for HOlden.
__________________
Dynamic White 1995 EF XR6 Auto

Now with:
Pacemaker 4499s
Lukey Catback Exhaust
Chrome BA XR-style tip
Airdam Mounted CAI with modified (bellmouth) airbox
Trip Computer install
KYB shocks
Bridgestone Adrenalin tyres

Coming Soon:
Exhaust Overhaul.....
Swordsman88 is offline  
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL